In previous posts, we’ve discussed the history of the mystery novel and are now identifying the FOUR ELEMENTARY clues that help us understand this genre’s perennial popularity.
We’ve already put the magnifying glass over our first two clues:
Clue 1: The Shocking Out of Place Body, and
Clue 2: The Challenge of the Puzzle.
Now, it’s time to examine the final pair:
CLUE 3: The Affirmation of the Sanctity of Human Life
Each of us believes that our life is important and that no one has the right to end it before time…and rightly so. It’s comforting to know that crime fiction confirms our belief in the sanctity of human life.
In a detective novel, it doesn’t matter if the murder victim was a queen or a prostitute; if her death is suspicious, it is thoroughly investigated by the police, the amateur dick or the avenging angel.
Of course, the goal is to catch and punish the guilty and to restore justice.
At least, it is for most crime writers. There are some, however, who challenge this tenet, like Minette Walters and Walter Mosley.
Even some of the oldies, like Conan Doyle and Christie, offered a storyline or two where the ‘guilty party’ wasn’t brought officially to book. I believe the very fact that these ‘other suitable endings’ exist strengthens the whole concept of moral rightness.
CLUE 4: The Return to Order from Disorder
By the end of a mystery novel, the world which had suddenly gone mad almost returns to normal and right is restored.
This is important for as we know, life goes on. But it’s not the same as it was before the horrific crime. How can it be? Someone’s been murdered and the killer has been captured and punished.
So, with the puzzle solved, the murderer revealed and paying a penalty, the natural balance of life is restored and our dear reader closes the book with a satisfied thump.
Given all this, the real mystery is why we wondered about the popularity of crime / detective fiction in the first place?














